South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's legal team filed a complaint on January 16 accusing the head of the police and anti-corruption agency of illegally entering the presidential residence.
Yonhap reported that Mr. Yoon's legal team filed complaints against the director of the Corruption Investigation Office of Korea (CIO) Oh Dong-woon, the director of the National Office of Investigation (NOI) Woo Jong-soo, and several other individuals.
The lawyers accused the named men of illegally entering the presidential palace and executing an arrest warrant for Mr. Yoon, arguing that these constituted crimes of rebellion, obstruction of official duties and violation of military secrets. South Korean law stipulates that the presidential residence is considered a secret military facility.
TV in South Korea broadcast news of President Yoon Suk Yeol's arrest on January 15.
"They mobilized more than 3,700 police officers to invade the palace and arrest the president, violating the provisions of the criminal procedure law," Mr. Yoon's lawyer argued.
Also on January 16, the Seoul Central District Court began reviewing the legality of the arrest warrant for President Yoon Suk-yeol. After CIO investigators arrested Yoon on January 15 to investigate the sedition charges stemming from the decision to declare martial law in early December 2024, the president's lawyers filed a petition with the court to review the decision.
During the review process, the 48-hour detention period for Mr. Yoon was postponed from around 2 p.m. on January 16 (local time) when investigators submitted documents to the court. The postponement lasted until the court returned the case to the investigation agency. On the second day of questioning (January 16), the lawyer said that President Yoon did not appear due to health problems, and he clearly explained his position on January 15, although Mr. Yoon had previously requested to postpone the questioning from the morning to the afternoon.
Mr. Yoon's side objected to the CIO's investigation, arguing that the agency had no jurisdiction, while the CIO stressed that the court's approval of the arrest warrant affirmed its authority.
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/phe-ong-yoon-cao-buoc-lanh-dao-co-quan-dieu-tra-vi-pham-bi-mat-quan-su-18525011619492995.htm
Comment (0)