Lucina Uddin, a UCLA neurology professor, filed a lawsuit in Brooklyn federal court last week against publishers Elsevier, John Wiley & Sons, Sage Publications, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, and Wolters Kluwer, according to Reuters news agency.
A professor in the Department of Psychology at UCLA since July 2023, Ms. Uddin has published more than 175 articles and participated in peer review for more than 150 journals.
According to Ms. Uddin's lawsuit, the publishers sued earned a total of more than $10 billion (VND246,200 billion) in revenue from peer-reviewed journals in 2023. Publisher Elsevier alone earned $3.8 billion from peer-reviewed journals in 2023, with a profit margin of up to 38%, surpassing both Apple and Google.
The lawsuit also cites a study showing that in 2020, academics participating in peer review contributed more than $1.5 billion worth of work. However, publishers invite academics to review scientific articles on the principle of "voluntary without compensation."
“Many manuscripts await review for months, even years. And it is unfair that busy scholars spend valuable time reviewing but are not paid,” said Uddin.
The lawsuit also alleges that these publishers "tacitly agreed" with each other to accept manuscripts by imposing "a submission rule that requires submission of manuscripts to only one journal," in violation of the US Antitrust Act.
The lawsuit also denounces what Professor Uddin calls the "gag rule" - which prevents scholars from freely sharing scientific advances in manuscripts while awaiting peer review of scientific papers.
Many scholars are forced to sign away intellectual property rights to their research without receiving any benefits, while publishers charge “the maximum the market will bear” for access to scientific knowledge, the lawsuit states.
The lawsuit portrays the academic journal publishing industry as a monopoly that manipulates the labor market and exploits young scholars whose careers depend on the speed of publication.
Publishers invite scholars to review scientific articles on a "voluntary, unpaid" basis.
Dean Harvey, the attorney representing Professor Uddin, said the for-profit academic publishing industry has made billions of dollars by “taking advantage of the goodwill and hard work of talented scholars and the taxpayer dollars that fund their research.” Harvey is seeking to elevate the case to class action status, representing hundreds of thousands of people who may be affected.
Professor Sune D. Müller, University of Oslo (Norway), said that the current journal publishing system forces scholars to choose lower quality research projects in order to be published quickly in low-prestige journals, according to University World News .
Mr. Müller hopes that the court's victory will bring fair competition to the publishing industry, forcing publishers to pay peer reviewers and shortening the time it takes to process scientific articles.
In response to the news, publisher Wiley called the allegations "baseless." Wolters Kluwer, Elsevier and other publishers declined to comment or have not yet made any statements regarding the lawsuit, according to Reuters news agency.
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/6-nha-xuat-ban-tap-chi-khoa-hoc-bi-to-boc-lot-hoc-gia-18524092410581965.htm
Comment (0)